| Get the EPUK Weekly News ! |
Once a week we put together a roundup of the week's photography, media and copyright news. It's interesting, free and you don't have to meet the usual EPUK membership criteria to sign up. We don't give your details to anyone else, and you can unsubscribe anytime. So what's stopping you ?
| This week we discussed... |
The above advertisers have not been endorsed by EPUK.
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
|
|
Sqweegee's Blog |
| 6 July 2006 |
The self-appointed critics in the DeleteMe group at picture-sharing community Flickr are never backward in coming forward. So presented with a photograph of a cyclist and a stairwell, and asked for opinions whether it should stay or be deleted, the comments came thick and fast.
“Why is the staircase so ‘soft’?” asked one. “So small…so blurry…to better show a sense of movement SOMETHING has to be in sharp focus” commented Caroline of Oregon (wasn’t she one of Henry VIII’s wives?).
“Grey, blurry, small, odd” (sounds like a description of half of the EPUK moderators) And – in what alcoholics refer to as a moment of clarity – another poster admitted “I have no clue about ‘good’ or ‘bad’ photography”.
Indeed. Because as the original poster already knew, and other members of the group were painfully slow to realise, the ‘soft’ ‘grey’ and ‘blurry’ image was by none other than Henri Cartier-Bresson. So while they lick their wounds (or, in some cases, continue to argue the photograph could have been better if HCB happened to have a Coolpix instead of a Leica in his hand), we’re happy to help out a few other photographers on their behalf.
Don – once you get the practice in, you’ll find that a bit of fill in flash can brighten up those under the helmet shadow woes. A bright scarf would really help to bring a bit of colour, too.
Davey, Davey, Davey – you’re clipping your histograms and destroying both highlight and shadow detail. Not a very good effort, I’m afraid. Have you tried photographing sunsets ? They’re very popular on Flickr.
Bobby – I think you’ll know in future to get your film developed at a reputable high street lab ! That way if they screw up the processing, you’ll at least get the price of the roll of film back. A combination of Unsharp Mask and “Reduce Noise” might help rescue their mistake. And remember – if your pictures aren’t good enough, you’re not spending enough time retouching in Photoshop.
Martin, Robbie – I don’t know what the two of you think you’re playing at, but if you’d have just moved slightly, you could have got their faces in the shot – or better still, you could have left out the flags altogether. Stop wasting our time with wind-on frames, and start taking proper pictures. How about cats or sunsets ?
![]()
Comments on this article:
or even funnier there is this…....
Critiques of very famous photos….
http://tinyurl.com/g5ycf
cheers,
Jeremy
Comment #2 posted by Jeremy at 7 July, 09:10 AM
I have got to say my favourite innane flickr comment was seen under a picture that had been treated with one of those photoshop plug-ins that supposedly turn it into a work by a famous artist. This one was in the style of Van Gogh and the comment was “Vincent would have loved this”
You have to understand that a very different (and rather frightening) aesthetic is abroad at flickr; one of bright colours, kittens, sunny days and happy smiley people.
It is, in other words, the land of the Stepford Photographers
Stay cool
Comment #3 posted by Colonel Blink the short -sighted gink at 15 December, 07:52 AM
| Headlines | News | First Person | Opinion | Resources | The Curve | Showcase | Masterclass | WTD | Sqweegee's blog | |
About | Join
| Help
| Shop
| Lost And Stolen
| Discounts
|
Support EPUK
|
Advertise on EPUK
| RSS
| Atom
|
| Site design and CMS integration © Dundee photographer Nick McGowan-Lowe. Site content is © original authors. To reproduce any content on this website, contact editor@epuk.org who will put you in touch with the copyright holder. You can read our privacy policy here. Any advice given on this site is not intended to replace professional advice, and EPUK and its authors accept no liability for loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. EPUK is not responsible for third party content, such as epuk.org adverts, other websites linked to from epuk.org, or comments added to articles by visitors. |
|
|
The Flickr commentators are entitled to their opinions. Enjoyment of photography is a very personal thing.
Comment #1 posted by Kev at 7 July, 08:34 AM